Lost in Translation
(2003)
Review by Will Manuel
Film Review Archive
Written & Directed by Sofia Coppola
Scarlett Johansson .... Charlotte
Bill Murray .... Bob Harris
Sofia Coppola's new film Lost In Translation
has a lot going for it. It has Bill Murray,
that other chick from Ghost World,
and more quirky Japanese people than you can
shake a Tokyo ball at. It offers American
audiences more about modern Japan than I ever
could. Where else can you hang with young
Asian chicks in Cossack hats besides, of course,
Budweiser ads? Then there's the not-young
Asian chicks not in Cossack hats. I for one
was fascinated to learn that Japanese women
execs are mainly used for reception lines,
and they dress exactly the same as Japanese
prostitutes, who hold the real power in society.
Of course Peter Greenaway's Eight And A
Half Women already broke this story, including
the deal with loneliness, pre and post mid-life
crisis, and especially the deal with pachinko,
and in a much darker, richer, more surreal
context. But that's okay. Greenaway's a complete
nut job, and besides, he left out the Simon
and Garfunkel-tinged hotel bars, Nicole Kidman's
formerly-anorexic sister, positive karaoke,
Japanese
T.V. ad directors, photographers,
the So Johnny Carson of Japan (see Telemundo),
busy intersections, oversections and tiny
green cabs. At least Sofia Coppola still has
her sanity. That is clear and not to be scoffed
at. Try buying Greenaway's film on DVD.
Waitwe could start over. Lost In
Translation: It's a decent film and it
doesn't reek like Personal Velocity.
Astute audiences will note the film takes
place in modern day Tokyo (formerly Edo, established
16c). Cultural nuances well shown if at times
with no clear purpose. Twenty seconds hopping
on steps at the Daitoku-ji: four thousand
dollars. Thirty seconds of flower arranging
footage: six thousand dollars. Fifteen seconds
at the Saiho-ji: two thousand dollars. Not
having to use your brain while watching a
nice little movie about nothing: priceless.
I would like to simply accuse LIT of
creeping Orientalism and be done with it.
But the thing is Coppola truly has nothing
against Japan. Her superficiality extends
pleasantly to all she touches. The relationship
between our little blonde girl and her photographer
(was he even an actor?) husband was as thinand
satisfyingas a cream-colored wafer.
Maybe if Coppola had inserted the beginning
of Contempt as prologue, we could have
cared about her troubled marriage. Maybe if
she didn't see herself in young Scarlett Johanssen,
she would have cast a more engaging actress.
Bill Murray is acting even when he's not just
like Al Pacino always tells the truth even
when he lies. Why? Because he's old and has
dark hair. Johanssen, on the other hand, has
no history, no scars, no dark hair. She never
killed nobody. She barely even has an ass!
So who cares about her pink underwear? Don't
get me wrong. Johansson is very pretty, but
I can't decide if I should buy her a drink
or some energy bars with ginko biloba.
I won't even mention the atrocious phone conversations
between Bob (Murray) and his stale stateside
wife. If the point was to show us why Bob
would think about leaving his wife, shouldn't
it also have shown us why he might not? Instead,
we're given an empty-hearted caricature whom
THIS man would never have married in the first
place. Perhaps he just didn't want to leave
his family? He still could have slept with
Charlotte and her foot. But I guess Bob has
suddenly become enlightened and is trying
to do the right thing? But who said not sleeping
with Charlotte is the right thing? I did not
say that. Or maybe he's not not doing it for
her? Maybe he has ED? Or VD? Maybe that's
what he whispered in her ear that made her
smile. "I was born, but..." Murray's
character is obviously Coppola's reaction
to her experience of growing up being hit
onor maybe not being hit on enoughby
older Hollywood actors. The point is the whole
thing just doesn't hold water. None of the
characters had any inner struggle to explain
their decisions or make us care about them
as individuals or make us even think at all.
Being half asleep does not count as inner
struggle. Crotchety film snobs like myself
get off on calling these manipulation, contrivance
and weak Hollywood tripe.
Stylistically, the film's selling point is
its serious jet lag melancholy and ennuic
pacing. The restaurant scene after Bill's
indiscretion was slow and sweet like a Maggie
Cheung Tony Leung longing contest. And it
definitely captured the 'morning after' 'what
else is there to say?' 'Sunday homework' feeling.
'Sunday homeworkughh.' But all of this
East meets digital video must have been done
way better by a Jia
Zhangke film I haven't seen yet
called Xiao Wu. It's your fault I haven't
seen this film. Not mine.
So what about the humor? Murray is as charming
and witty as one could possibly expect considering
he just joined the California Neo-Nazi movement.
Yeah, how you like the film now? There's even
a cameo by Not Cameron Diaz presumably to
allow for some hot Hollywood satire. But if
you are going to have satire, why ever deviate
from Bunuel? Why be cheap when you could be
oblique? Or if you must be a cheap window
shade, then pull the string down and let it
rip up. Lost's satire is unfortunately
the fill-up-the-screen-waste-my-time varietyfar
from the maddening Being John Malkovich
and nowhere near as punishing as the low blows
of Ghost World. "We both have
dogs. We both live in L.A." Yes, very
funny. 'E' can do this. Speaking of Not Cameron
Diaz, has anyone seen Chasing Amy?
It sucks. Here's an example of Coppola's failure
to actuate the signal. We're supposed to think
our girl is smart while Not Cameron Diaz is
Charlie's Angels dumb because she's
going under Evelyn Waugh, a male author's
pseudonym. But actually, it's pretty cool
for a girl to use a guy's pseudonym like that.
Never mind the real Cameran Diaz thinks Evelyn
Waugh is a suitably priced hair product, or
at least that's what she told Craig Kilborne's
knee. Here, Sofia Coppola and friends have
simply made an honest miscalculation. This
sort of thing has cropped up before and it's
always been due to human error. I prescribe
Spirited Away.
- ~
-
- More of Will Manuel's film reviews can be
seen on www.coldbacon.com
Back to the top
~
Post your comments to the Arts Bulletin Board
About Us 9.11.01 Hardcopy Letters Writers Group Links + Staff Legal Statements

|