
Buy Me an Old Russian T-50 MBT (Main Battle Tank) For My Birthday So I Can Run
Over Some SUVs On My Block

Garrett Mok Lays
Rubber on SUV Lane.
Archive: Psycho Killer, Kill
Yourself
If you are like me, the smell of gasoline reminds
you of a certain truck stop near Dubuque, Iowa when you'd realized you'd just drove
five hundred miles straight without stopping so many years ago. To me, the smell of Unleaded Premium in the
morning is like, victory... No, more like
freedom. As an avid outdoors person, I dig
cars, motion, wind and bugs and the whole nine yards. And trucks and 4 x 4 vehicles of all
sorts. However, over the past decade, or more
specifically in the last five years or so, I've been noticing with not-so-secret disdain
the new American motor trend called the SUV, the Supposedly Utility Vehicle.
I'll be frank: SUVs are for diaper warriors. What's alarming is that these suburban
mall-busters are popping up everywhere in New York City.
There are more SUVs cranking down Bowery than there are hobos and punk
rockers. Where are you going to go
off-roading in New York City? In Central
Park? I tried to do that once on my
mountain bike (the pedaling kind) and almost got ticketed a hundred bucks by an equestrian
cop.
Let's get real. The last
motorized vehicle I owned was a '82 Chevy S-10 Longbed pickup with a 14-gauge steel
toolbox, 4-speed stick, that was used for hauling wood in Duchess County, New York
and occasional joy rides on muddy fire roads through Fahnstalk State Park. An old girlfriend of mine couldn't even steer it
without using both her hands (read: no power steering).
But it hauled wood, lots of it, and did its job.
It did its job. Now that was a
truck. Toyota Rav 4, or Lincoln Navigator for
that matter with tilt-steering and mocha leather seats, ain't.
The facts are there: SUVs
for the most part are less safe than their passenger car counterparts, due to their
top-heaviness and lack of braking power. They
are gas guzzlers, and produce more exhaust fumes--therefore more harmful to the
environment. And the worst of all, the SUVs
are plain embarrassing, because you know, I know, they (the owners) know and their cousins
and co-workers know that they have never taken their untrailworthy, behemoth-sized
Expeditions and QX4s anywhere remotely near dirt or mud.
The compact SUVs such as the Rav 4--SUVettes--are no better; they are underpowered and structurally questionable. So why are they so popular?
The automobile manufacturers take sedan engines and bolt them to
existing pickup frames with almost no structural modification, put some square,
tough-looking body molding over it, mark up $5,000 to $10,000, and voila!, pops a SUV. It's a theater of hollow maximization, much like
silicon breast implants. We somehow know they
are fake, but some of us like the way they look, for a while anyway. In a way, the monied suckers who casually buy
these wannabe hotrods almost deserve them, except for the fact that their badly-handling,
gas-guzzling mausoleums-on-wheels affect other drivers and pedestrians in a bad way. I have a friend who admits he drives less
carefully when he is enthroned in his Dodge Durango, because in case of a crash,
"it's the other guy who's gonna get hurt."
True to his word, he has backed into an Escort not so long ago with his high rear
bumper and put a mean dent in the Escort's side door like it was a soda can.
So why doesn't somebody ask, Detroit, what have you done? Alas, it is not their fault, since we live in a
wonderful world of market economy. SUVs are
like the coca, and GMs, Fords and Dodges of
this country are merely the fancy-hatted pushers, matching supply for demand, and raking
in billions annually.
My question is, do you still want an off-road truck after all this? This would be a perhaps good time to differentiate
between a true off-road truck and a SUV, but for the sake of expediency, let's just
say I am talking about a 4x4 vehicle. But the more important question is, do
you want to go off-roading? Think about this
carefully. If the answer is a genuine, no-holds-barred Yes, then we'll roll up our sleeves and step into the shop.
Otherwise, there is no need to read any further. I have organized the
following advice into three sections: Must-to-Avoid, Half-Decent, and
Kick-Ass. Needless to say, your actual mileage may vary.
Must-to-Avoid:
Jeep Cherokee & Grand Cherokee: bad in crash
tests. Chevy Blazer (except the
Seventies and Eighties full-sized Blazer) and Tahoe; Ford Explorer
(except the 2-door "Sport" version with a V6 or V8 engine swap and aftermarket
suspension lift) and Expedition: basically pickups with extra seats and roofs
over them, and not trailworthy. Same
with off-the-shelf Dodge Durangos. Some
are not even four-wheel drives. They should have four gear settings: Malls,
Groceries, Movies, and Park.
Oldsmobile Bravada, Cadillac Escalade, Lexus
LX470, Infiniti QX4. Any
four-door large luxury SUVs. Please, people,
grow old gracefully. Don't fight it. Just let go. Buy a respectable BMW 7-series sedan
or a Jaguar XJ8: you' ll get better performance out of them and you won't embarrass your
all-knowing grandkids.
Mercedes Benz
ML55:
this is actually an innovatively-designed,
well-built (of course, it's German)
truck wannabe that may even be trailworthy. It even got very good crash test results.
However, due to its brand-namesake--the
very conceivable fact that no one
in their right mind will want to drive
a $50,000 Mercedes through paint-chipping
rocks and corroding mud, therefore
defeating its very reason-for-being-a-mud-stud--I
have to say it also should be avoided,
unless you want to scream
midlife crisis. It's your
choice.
Kia Sportage, Toyota Rav 4 and 4 Runner, Isuzu Rodeo,
Geo Tracker, etc. These are motorized
equivalents of day-glo flip-flops. Imagine
wearing flip-flops to go rockclimbing, or to a party.
They'd better stay on boardwalks.
Half-Decent--SUVs that I don't
at least flinch from when I encounter
them on the street:
Toyota Landcruiser. The
TLC has a legacy of off-road motorsports under its hood since its birth in the Fifties. Once, on a Brooklyn street, I saw a beet-red
early-Nineties TLC with a bumper sticker that said, 'I survived the Alaskan Highway.' Although the Alaskan Highway, or ALCAN, is
hardly off-road, I have a respect for any vehicle that has choked on at least a bit of
permafrost outside Aspen city limits, or for that matter, Poughkeepsie Galleria Mall. That particular TLC also had what looked like
polar bear claw marks under the driver's side mirror--received ostensibly during the epic
sojourn on the frozen ALCAN--which impressed the hell out of me.
The new Nissan
XTerra: looks pretty good for
an off-the-shelf mud toy.
I have once actually muttered,
'You sexy bitch,' to the presence
of a brand-new forest-green XTerra. I personally don't
know anyone who's ever taken the XTerra
off-road, or anywhere resembling ex-terra,
but looking at the specs in those
fancy spreads in Outside magazine,
it may actually be trailworthy--MTV
X-Games style--granted with some minor
suspension upgrades.
Say about 2-inch body lift
& 4-inch suspension jackup (which
will make it less stable on a highway,
and even dangerous at high speed,
but this is an off-roader, right? Right.).
Actually, the only reason I
like this X-factor is because it has
a built-in internal bike rack.
Excellent, dude.
Now, the ones you've been waiting for--the real Kick-Ass
trailworthy baddies:
Late Eighties & early Nineties Jeep CJ-7 (no
Seventies CJ-7: they lacked stabilizers and rolled over like a pregnant penguin. I personally knew a couple of people who were killed in a roller during a cold
upstate New York winter.). Good old Jeep. The Volkswagen of dirt-and-sun fun.
Land Rover Defender 90: this is built-up to the British Army
specs, and saw action in Desert Storm. If
it's good enough for the famed Desert Rats regiment of the Royal British Army, it's good
enough for me. Need I say more? It's a bloody shame, then, that Land Rover
doesn't make these beauties any more. Even
the venerable British toughies gave in to the cloying consumer demand for leather-seated
couch wagons, and dropped the badass Defender line entirely in 2000. I will trade in ten Lexus for a pearl '95 Defender
hardtop any day.
AM General
Hummer, or the Humvee. Sure, the thing's
wider than a city sidewalk and costs
almost as much as an one-bedroom co-opt
in a Park Slope brownstone, but the
only thing that has a better off-road
capabilities than the mean Hummer
will be a Bradley Fighting Vehicle,
and those ain't for sale.
The Hummer is the ultimate
party weapon for a vehicular Woodstock,
granted you can pay the ticket price.
It can stomp over an Acura,
and pull your waterlogged butt out
of Gowanus Canal.
Finally, indulge me and my brief high-school boy fantasy in this
ultimate 4x4 getup. The down home, slightly
rednecky, all-American off-road package, and you merely have to put a small dent in your
trust fund to do it. This is it. Picture a '96 (the year is somewhat arbitrary: any
late Eighties or Nineties model will do) metallic-blue Ford Ranger XLT Supercab.
4.0 liter V6 stock engine, good enough straight out of the box to take it off-roading. But wait. Like
your ex- once probably told you, If You're Gonna Do It, Babe, Do It Right. Rig it with a high-performance K&N
Filtercharger for starters. You can later add a
Paxton Supercharger if you really want to get serious. Jack up clearance with
Skyjacker Softride 6" suspension lift, add Rancho torsion bars, and 31-inch BF
Goodrich All-Terrain tires mounted on 15x8.5 Centerline Hellcat rims. Then add Smittybilt front bumper with 100-watt foglights
and heavy-duty skidplate to battle bad visibility and protruding boulders. If
you don't know what the hell this is all about, just pretend that you do. Because that's what SUVs are all about. But I can guarantee that this Ford--the SUV-Killer
Ranger--is the off-road getup you want. If that's what you really want. The Real Thing.
Garrett Mok is the Publisher
of 12gauge.com, and a lover of pickups--trucks, that is.
Back to the top.
You can respond to any of this on Out-of-Bounds Bulletin Board.
Or Email us. |